Tijykoy
Tijykoy

Decision Making — Case Studies

Decisionsexamined.

Real situations, concrete reasoning, and the moments where a clearer process made the difference.

Decision-making case studies and analysis at Tijykoy webinars
All case studies
Stop Trusting Your Gut: What Intuition Actually Costs You
Decision Making Critical Thinking

Stop Trusting Your Gut: What Intuition Actually Costs You

The evidence against intuition-led choices is stronger than most experts admit

Gut feeling is not a decision-making tool. Here is what the evidence says about when intuition fails experienced professionals most.

Declan Firth 3 min read
Read case study
Group Consensus Is Not a Safety Net — It Is a Trap
Group Dynamics Decision Making

Group Consensus Is Not a Safety Net — It Is a Trap

Why unanimous agreement in decision meetings should worry you, not reassure you

Decisions made by consensus feel safer but the evidence points in the opposite direction. Here is why group agreement is often the worst outcome.

Aoife Brennan-Quill 3 min read
Read case study
More Data Will Not Save a Bad Decision Process
Analysis Paralysis Decision Making

More Data Will Not Save a Bad Decision Process

The research on information overload and why better decisions need less, not more

Collecting more information before deciding feels responsible. In practice, it often makes decisions slower, not better. Here is the research.

Roisin Talbot 4 min read
Read case study
The Sunk Cost Fallacy Is Not Just a Textbook Problem
Cognitive Bias Decision Making

The Sunk Cost Fallacy Is Not Just a Textbook Problem

Why knowing about this bias in theory does almost nothing to stop it in practice

Everyone knows about sunk costs. Almost no one avoids them in practice. Here is why knowing the bias does not protect you from it.

Niall Creedon 4 min read
Read case study
Decision Frameworks Collapse Exactly When You Need Them Most
Decision Frameworks Decision Making

Decision Frameworks Collapse Exactly When You Need Them Most

Structured decision tools fail under real pressure — here is the evidence and a simpler alternative

Pros, cons lists and decision matrices look rigorous on paper. Under real pressure, they are the first thing abandoned. Here is what the pattern looks like.

Sorcha Muldoon 4 min read
Read case study

How we structure each case

A process that holds under pressure

1

Situation

What was the actual problem being faced

2

Constraints

Time, information gaps, competing priorities

3

Options

What was considered and why some were dropped

4

Decision

The chosen path and the reasoning behind it

5

Outcome

What happened and what it taught us

Each case study follows the same five-stage structure. That consistency is deliberate — it lets you compare reasoning across very different scenarios without getting lost in unfamiliar formats.

The goal is not to present perfect decisions. Most of the cases here involve real trade-offs, incomplete information, and outcomes that were mixed at best.

Reading through them builds a kind of pattern recognition. You start to notice when a decision is being made too early, or when the framing of a problem is quietly steering the outcome.

5stages per case — same structure every time for direct comparison
8–12 minutes average reading time per full case study
3+ decision frameworks referenced across the full library

The peoplebehind the analysis

Contributors who examined these cases and wrote up what they found.

Expert contributor Brendan Ó Floinn

Brendan Ó Floinn

Decision Research Lead

Spent years watching how groups reach conclusions under pressure. The patterns repeat more than people expect.

  • Focuses on group dynamics in time-limited decisions
  • Contributed case studies across 4 topic areas
  • Based in Galway, runs quarterly webinar sessions
Expert contributor Sigríður Magnúsdóttir

Sigríður Magnúsdóttir

Behavioural Analysis

Most decision errors happen before the actual choice point. The framing does the damage early.

  • Specialises in cognitive bias identification
  • Reviews case drafts for analytical accuracy
  • Joined Tijykoy in 2019 as a contributing editor
Expert contributor Tomáš Vrábel

Tomáš Vrábel

Structured Reasoning

A decision that looks obvious in hindsight usually had at least two reasonable alternatives at the time.

  • Works on option mapping and trade-off documentation
  • Contributed the constraint analysis framework used site-wide
  • Leads the monthly deep-dive webinar series